- One polo order, and where each step lives in CloudSuite Fashion
- The same order as CMT and as full package
- Output of the merchandising workshop
- Five fit-gap rows, scored for the polo factory on M3
- The polo as one style with five SKUs
- Jeans on three feature groups: the SKU count
- Four rolls of "180 GSM" jersey against one conversion factor
- Three dye lots with their lot attributes, and the cut plan
- A style-level BOM with SKU exceptions for fabric
- The polo's operations, minutes and line capacity
- The polo order's approval calendar, worked back from ex-factory
- Embroidery as a subcontract operation on the manufacturing order
- A quotation cost build for the polo (illustrative, USD per piece)
- Purchase charges on the imported fabric
- The final inspection sample for 3,000 polos
- Packing 3,000 polos into cartons, one dye lot per carton
- Down payment, letter of credit and exchange difference
- Test script: the polo order from customer order to cash
- Test script: shade split at cutting
- One purchase request, from MerchandiserOS to M3 and back
- The polo seen from the brand and the buying agent
- The polo order with operations on top
Part 1Before you start
1Who Infor CloudSuite Fashion fits
Infor CloudSuite Fashion fits large and upper mid-market apparel, footwear, accessories and home-textile companies that want an industry suite with native style, colour and size handling and are ready for a partner-led, multi-module project. Infor describes it as a SaaS suite for "apparel, footwear, accessories, and home/textile companies", and its fashion documentation describes an industry process catalogue targeted at cut and sew manufacturers.
Infor CloudSuite Fashion is Infor's fashion industry suite, built on the Infor M3 ERP (the documentation for the suite sits under Infor's M3 documentation). Infor's fashion page lists the parts of the suite: a fashion and apparel ERP, Fashion PLM, configure-price-quote (CPQ), fashion demand forecasting, the Infor Nexus supply chain network, a warehouse management system, sustainability and compliance, e-commerce (Infor Rhythm for Commerce) and the cloud technology platform.
Signs Infor CloudSuite Fashion is a good choice
Infor tends to fit when the business is large enough to use the suite and has the people to run a long project.
- The company runs several sites, brands or channels and wants one fashion-aware ERP across them.
- Style counts per season are in the hundreds or thousands, and the size and colour matrix is a daily tool.
- The company also wants PLM, a supplier network (Infor Nexus) or a WMS from the same vendor.
- A partner with M3 fashion experience is available, and the company can release key users for months.
Signs to slow down
Slow down when the size of the suite is larger than the problem.
- The factory is a single-site CMT unit with a few hundred operators. The suite is heavy for that, in our judgement; a smaller ERP plus an operations layer often fits better (see the Odoo chapter or apparel-specific ERPs).
- The main pain is sampling, T&A and the floor, not the ledger or the supply chain.
- Nobody has checked which suite modules are in the contract, and the plan assumes all of them.
- The go-live date falls inside peak season.
2Why no ERP fits apparel on its own
No general ERP fits apparel out of the box, because an ERP is built around a known item with one bill of materials, while a garment order starts as a style that is quoted, sampled and approved before any item exists. Infor has gone further than most general ERPs by adding a fashion layer to M3, with styles, SKUs, a matrix and style-level structures, yet the development, approval and floor work still sits before or beside the transactions M3 records. The same wall applies to brands and buying agents: their development, sampling and follow-up across many factories happen before any purchase order exists.
An ERP is built around the transaction: a known item, a fixed bill of materials, a price, a receipt, an invoice. It is right to be strict about that, because strictness keeps the books correct. A garment order does not start there.
Forcing an ERP to do all of this means heavy customisation in the one system that most needs to stay standard. The durable answer is to give the ERP the books and give the operations to a system built for them. Section 3 summarises that model and section 33 shows it in full.
One polo order, and where each step lives in CloudSuite Fashion
A buyer sends a tech pack for 3,000 men's piqué polos in navy, five sizes, ex-factory 15 December. Follow the order and ask where each step has a documented home in the Infor suite.
| Step | What happens | Documented home in the Infor suite? |
|---|---|---|
| Tech pack arrives | Measurements by size, construction, artwork, trims list | Fashion PLM, if licensed; check what it holds for points of measure |
| Costing and quote | Fabric use from a marker, CM from minutes, quote at USD 4.26 FOB | Not documented as a garment cost build in M3 |
| Lab dips, strike-off, fit sample | Three lab dip rounds before navy is approved | Not found as an M3 object; check Fashion PLM |
| Order confirmed | Size breakdown 300 / 750 / 900 / 750 / 300 | Yes: customer order with the fashion matrix |
| Fabric and trims bought | 925 kg of jersey, rib, buttons, labels, polybags | Yes: purchase orders |
| Fabric received | Three dye lots, rolls of different width and weight | Yes for lots with attributes such as shade; roll-level conversion needs design |
| Cutting and sewing | Cut by dye lot, 18 minutes per polo, output by line by hour | Manufacturing orders, yes; line and hour capture, no |
| Embroidery outside | Panels out, 1% loss, panels back | Yes: subcontract operation |
| Final AQL inspection | General level II, AQL 2.5, sample of 125 pieces | Quality inspection requests, yes; ISO 2859-1 tables, not found |
| Shipping and invoice | Cartons, packing list, commercial invoice | Yes: delivery and invoice |
M3 has a home for more steps than most general ERPs. The steps without one are still the ones where the order is won or lost: the quote, the approvals and the floor.
3The recommended architecture, in short
Agree before discovery which system owns which part of the business. Our recommendation: Infor keeps the books, and an operations system built for apparel runs the work from the style to the shipment. With CloudSuite Fashion, this also means deciding which suite modules you actually need, because the suite offers some of the same ground.
| Area | Owned by | Why there |
|---|---|---|
| Style, tech pack, samples and approvals, quotation costing | Operations layer (or Infor Fashion PLM if already licensed; one owner only) | This work happens before an M3 SKU exists, and it changes daily |
| Buyer orders, procurement planning, production planning, shop floor, quality, logistics | Operations layer | It needs sizes, dye lots, minutes, inspections and dates in one place |
| Shop-floor capture | The operations layer's floor screens, or Garment.io connected to it | Operators need a simple screen, not an office form |
| Accounts, payables and receivables, invoicing, payments, stock value, tax and e-invoicing | Infor | This is the legal and financial record |
MerchandiserOS is built for the operations side: style and tech pack, quotations and costing, buyer orders, procurement, planning, production, the shop floor (on its own floor screens or through its Garment.io integration), quality and logistics. Infor keeps accounts, payables and receivables, invoicing, payments, stock value, tax and e-invoicing. The rest of this chapter still explains how to configure M3 for garment production, because some companies choose that, and a consultant needs to know what each choice costs. Section 32 shows the split in full.
4Business types, and what each needs from Infor
The business type decides who owns the material, what is invoiced and which parts of the Infor suite carry weight. Settle it in the first discovery meeting, because many companies run two types at once.
| Type | What it does | What it needs from Infor | Where it struggles |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMT (cut, make, trim) | Sews buyer-supplied fabric; sells labour | Buyer-owned stock held apart, material reconciliation, service invoicing | The suite is large for a CMT unit, in our judgement |
| Full-package (FOB) factory | Buys all materials, makes, ships | Style and SKU matrix, style-level BOMs, purchasing, lots, charges, subcontracting, multi-currency | Size consumption, roll conversion, sampling and floor capture |
| Vertical manufacturer-brand | Owns factories and a brand, sells wholesale and direct | The whole suite: ERP, PLM, WMS, demand forecasting, e-commerce | Project size and the number of modules to integrate |
| Textile mill | Turns yarn into fabric | Process manufacturing, batches, weight units, lot attributes | Dye recipes and batch genealogy: check M3 process features with the partner |
| Brand or wholesaler | Designs and sells; factories make for it | Vendor POs, charges and landed cost, wholesale orders, PLM, Infor Nexus | Following development and production across many factories (section 32) |
| Buying agent | Sources for buyers on commission; holds no stock | Light accounting and commission invoicing | The suite's manufacturing and stock modules are mostly not needed |
| Own-label retailer | Develops its own label and buys it from factories | Vendor POs, landed cost, PLM, retail and e-commerce modules | Development and vendor follow-up across factories |
The same order as CMT and as full package
The buyer offers the polo two ways. As full package, the factory buys everything and sells at USD 4.26 FOB. As CMT, the buyer ships the fabric (the same three dye lots, 2,880 m) and the factory charges an illustrative USD 1.60 a piece for making.
| Question | Full package | CMT |
|---|---|---|
| Who buys the fabric | The factory, on an M3 purchase order | The buyer; no purchase order in M3 |
| How the fabric enters M3 | A receipt that raises stock value and a payable | Held apart from the factory's stock value; design this with finance and the partner |
| Invoice to the buyer | 3,000 × 4.26 = USD 12,780.00 | 3,000 × 1.60 = USD 4,800.00 |
| Material reconciliation | Internal: fabric used against the BOM | External: 2,880 m received, 2,856 m used, 24 m returned or accounted for |
The 2,856 m used and the 24 m left come from the cut plan in Example 8. In CMT that plan is the evidence shown to the buyer, so it must be kept per dye lot.
Part 2Discovery
5Who should be on an Infor fashion project team?
An Infor fashion project needs one decision owner for every design question, and most of those owners sit in merchandising, production, stores, quality and finance, not in IT. The partner configures; the business decides how styles, units, lots, costs and inspections work.
| Role | Usually | Decides |
|---|---|---|
| Sponsor | Owner or managing director | Scope, which suite modules, budget, go-live window, what stays outside Infor |
| Project lead | A senior manager released for the project | Priorities, test sign-off, cut-over readiness |
| Merchandising head | Head of merchandising | Style and SKU model, feature groups, seasons, order entry, T&A ownership |
| Product development lead | Technical or sampling manager | Where tech packs live (PLM or operations layer), approval rounds |
| Production manager and IE | Factory manager, IE manager | Manufacturing order level, operations, minutes, subcontract steps, floor capture |
| CAD and marker lead | CAD room head | Consumption per size, marker efficiency |
| Stores head | Fabric and trims stores | Units, lots, attributes at receipt, locations |
| Quality manager | QA manager | Inspection types, sampling plans, who may release a failed lot |
| Finance head | CFO or chief accountant | Costing, charges, currencies, prepayments, chargebacks, tax |
| Partner consultants | Infor partner | How each decision is set up in M3 and the suite; what needs an extension |
Keep a decision log with the date, the owner, the option chosen and the options rejected. With a suite this size, the log is the only place where a decision made in month two can still be found in month nine.
6What should discovery workshops cover for an Infor fashion project?
Run one workshop per department, each walking a real, recent order from start to finish, and map every finding to a fit-gap line. Use the company's own orders, not Infor's demo data. The methodology page lists the full question sets (ERP-agnostic method); the questions below are the ones that matter most on M3.
Merchandising and product
- Which axes does each product family use: colour and size only, or also fit, inseam or cup? This decides the X, Y and Z feature groups.
- How are seasons named, and does a carry-over style keep its number?
- How do buyers order: by matrix, by ratio pack, by delivery drop?
- Where do tech packs, approvals and the T&A calendar live today, and will Fashion PLM or an operations layer own them?
Stores and purchasing
- Which materials are bought in kg and used in metres? What is measured per roll at receipt?
- Which attributes must travel with a lot: shade group, GSM, width, shrinkage, country of origin?
- Which import charges (freight, clearing, bank charges, duty) must reach the material cost?
Production, quality and finance
- At what level is production controlled: style, style-colour, SKU, delivery or cut?
- Which processes go outside, and how are pieces counted out and back?
- Which inspections run, and which buyers set their own AQL?
- Which currencies, prepayments, letters of credit and chargebacks does finance handle, and which e-invoicing rules apply?
Output of the merchandising workshop
| # | Finding | Fit-gap line | Decision needed | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Buyer POs arrive as PDFs and are keyed twice | 41 | Where the order is entered once | Merchandising head |
| M2 | The ±3% quantity tolerance is not recorded anywhere | 43 | Where tolerance is held and checked before shipment | Merchandising head |
| M3 | Three lab dip rounds lived in one merchandiser's email | 10 | Whether PLM or an operations layer owns approval rounds | Development lead |
| M4 | Fabric was bought on the base-size consumption on a past order | 12 | Where size-graded consumption is calculated | CAD lead |
| M5 | Some polos also come in a slim fit | 1 | Whether fit becomes the Z feature group for tops | Merchandising head |
M5 is an M3-specific decision. Adding an axis later means new SKUs for every style that uses it, so decide the feature groups per product family now.
7The apparel fit-gap checklist for Infor CloudSuite Fashion: 52 lines
A fit-gap checklist records, requirement by requirement, whether the ERP meets it as standard, with configuration, with custom work, or better outside the ERP. The 52 lines below are our assessment of Infor CloudSuite Fashion on M3 for a typical full-package garment factory, based on Infor's documentation where we found it. Lines marked "check" were not found in the documentation we reviewed; confirm them with Infor or your partner before you sign a scope.
Key: Standard documented as delivered · Configure settings or setup work · Custom build an extension or third-party tool · Operations layer better run in an apparel operations system and passed to Infor
| # | Requirement | Infor answer | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product | |||
| 1 | Style master with a colour-size matrix | Standard | Style and SKUs on feature groups X, Y, Z (section 11) |
| 2 | Size scales per product family | Configure | Features and options per axis |
| 3 | Season and style reuse | Configure | Seasons are set up in CRS912; reuse rules need design |
| 4 | Carry-over styles with a new price or BOM | Configure | Design versioning with the partner |
| 5 | Prepacks and ratio packs | Configure | Check pack handling in your version |
| 6 | Pairs and multi-packs | Configure | Alternate units per item |
| 7 | Buyer's own style and colour codes | Configure | Alias types or user-defined style fields |
| 8 | Tech-pack revision linked to the order | Operations layer | Or Fashion PLM if licensed; one owner |
| 9 | Points of measure with tolerance per size | Operations layer | Check Fashion PLM; not an M3 object we found |
| 10 | Sample types and rounds with buyer approval | Operations layer | Not found in M3 documentation |
| BOM and costing | |||
| 11 | BOM lines that apply by colour or size | Standard | Structures at style level with style-colour or SKU exceptions |
| 12 | Size-graded fabric consumption | Configure | SKU-level exceptions per size; generate them from a table (section 14) |
| 13 | Wastage and shrinkage held separately | Custom build | Check scrap factors in your version; separate factors need design |
| 14 | Trims that change by colourway | Standard | Style-colour exceptions |
| 15 | Pre-costing before the style exists | Operations layer | No garment cost build documented in M3 |
| 16 | Standard against actual cost per order | Configure | Product costing exists; quote-against-actual needs reporting |
| 17 | Labour cost from operation minutes | Configure | Operations with times and work-center rates |
| 18 | Import charges on receipts | Configure | Purchase costing model and costing elements (section 18); check stock valuation |
| 19 | Quote versions and approval | Operations layer | CPQ is in the suite; check whether it fits garment costing |
| Materials | |||
| 20 | Purchase, stock and issue units with per-lot conversion | Custom build | Alternate units carry a factor per item; per-lot conversion needs design or catch weight |
| 21 | GSM and width per lot or roll | Configure | Lot or balance-ID attributes |
| 22 | Roll tracking | Configure | Balance ID or lot per roll; decide the level |
| 23 | Dye lot and shade | Standard | Infor names shade as a lot attribute |
| 24 | Four-point fabric inspection | Custom build | QMS tests can hold results; defect points per roll need design |
| 25 | Quality hold and quarantine | Standard | Quality inspection requests on receipt per lot |
| 26 | Buyer-supplied (consigned) stock | Configure | Design with finance; check your version |
| 27 | Reserved against free stock | Standard | Allocation |
| 28 | Leftovers and stock-lot disposal | Configure | Item type and sales flow |
| Production | |||
| 29 | Work orders per style-colour or delivery | Configure | Manufacturing orders; grouping is a design choice |
| 30 | Cut orders, lay plans, marker efficiency | Custom build | Usually CAD plus a cutting tool |
| 31 | Bundles and bundle tickets | Custom build | A shop-floor system |
| 32 | WIP by stage and line | Operations layer | Manufacturing order status is not line and bundle WIP |
| 33 | Graded output (first quality, seconds, rejects) | Operations layer | Produced is not the same as shippable |
| 34 | Subcontract out and back with loss | Standard | Subcontract orders with or without a manufacturing order (section 17) |
| 35 | Capacity by line from minutes | Configure | Planning and Scheduling Workbench for fashion; license and design check |
| 36 | T&A with a critical path | Operations layer | Not found as an M3 object |
| Quality | |||
| 37 | Inline and end-of-line capture | Operations layer | Operator-level capture belongs on the floor |
| 38 | Final AQL to ISO 2859-1 at the buyer's level | Custom build | ISO 2859-1 tables not found in QMS documentation |
| 39 | Logged override of a failed inspection | Configure | QI request results are recorded; design who may release |
| 40 | Lab tests and certificates per order | Configure | QMS tests and specifications per item |
| Sales and shipping | |||
| 41 | Grid order entry by colour and size | Standard | Fashion Matrix plug-in on customer orders; also distribution orders |
| 42 | Several deliveries per order | Configure | Lines per delivery date and address |
| 43 | Over and under-shipment tolerance | Custom build | Check your version; usually an extension |
| 44 | Carton packing and labels (SSCC) | Configure | Packing exists; buyer label formats need design; the suite WMS may help |
| 45 | EDI 850, 855, 856, 810 | Configure | Check with Infor which EDI route your tenant uses |
| 46 | Buyer label and ASN rules | Custom build | Per buyer |
| Finance | |||
| 47 | Multi-currency and exchange differences | Standard | Expected in an enterprise ERP; confirm revaluation rules with the partner |
| 48 | Letter of credit terms and document checking | Custom build | No LC object found |
| 49 | Advances and down payments | Configure | Check prepayment handling in your version |
| 50 | Reason-coded chargebacks | Configure | Reason codes on deductions; design with finance |
| 51 | Profitability per order | Configure | Accounting dimensions per order; design with finance |
| 52 | E-invoicing per country | Configure | Check your country (section 22) |
Counted from this table, 9 of the 52 lines are standard, 25 need configuration, 9 need custom work and 9 are better run outside Infor. That count is our assessment for a typical full-package factory, not a survey. Compared with a general ERP, M3 scores better on the product lines (1, 11, 14, 23, 41) because of its fashion layer, and about the same on sampling, T&A, floor capture and AQL.
Five fit-gap rows, scored for the polo factory on M3
| # | Requirement | Evidence from the factory | Decision | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Style and SKU matrix | Polos in S–XXL, some in slim fit | X colour, Y size, Z fit for tops | Merchandising head |
| 12 | Size-graded consumption | Base-size buying ran short (Example 9) | SKU-level exceptions generated from the CAD table | CAD lead |
| 21 | GSM and width per roll | Four rolls held 1.9 m less than the factor said (Example 7) | Lot attributes for GSM and width, mandatory at receipt | Stores head |
| 38 | Final AQL | Buyer manual requires level II, AQL 2.5 | Run outside M3; the pass releases the delivery | QA manager |
| 10 | Sample rounds | Lab dips tracked in email | Operations layer owns rounds; no PLM licence bought | Sponsor |
8Which Infor suite modules and which deployment should you choose?
Choose modules and deployment after the fit-gap: the suite lists ERP, PLM, CPQ, demand forecasting, Infor Nexus, WMS, sustainability, e-commerce and the cloud platform, and a garment manufacturer rarely needs all of them on day one. Infor sells CloudSuite Fashion as a cloud subscription; we do not quote prices because they depend on the contract.
| Suite component (Infor's naming) | What it covers | For a garment factory |
|---|---|---|
| Fashion and apparel ERP (M3) | Styles and SKUs, orders, purchasing, stock, manufacturing, finance | The core; always needed |
| Fashion PLM | Product development and tech packs | Needed if development runs in Infor; skip if an operations layer owns style and tech pack |
| CPQ | Configure, price, quote | Check whether it can hold a garment cost build; often not the first need |
| Demand forecasting | Forecasts for planning | Brands and vertical retailers more than make-to-order factories |
| Infor Nexus | Supply chain network with trading partners | Useful when buyers or suppliers already work on it; ask your buyers |
| WMS | Warehouse management | Large distribution centres; a factory store may not need it |
| Rhythm for Commerce | E-commerce | Brands selling direct |
Single-tenant or multi-tenant?
Infor's own pages describe both, so confirm which one your contract gives you. The fashion industry page says the suite is "available in a multi-tenant cloud", while the CloudSuite Fashion documentation overview describes delivery on AWS in a single-tenant, subscription model. The answer matters because it shapes what extensions, upgrades and integrations the partner may build (section 24).
Questions to settle before signing
- Which suite modules are in the subscription, and which are only on the product page?
- Single-tenant or multi-tenant, and what does that allow for extensions?
- Which M3 fashion features (matrix plug-ins, Planning Workbench, QMS) are licensed?
- Is ION API Gateway access included for the integrations the design needs?
9Infor CloudSuite Fashion vs SAP S/4HANA for fashion: which should a manufacturer choose?
Both are enterprise ERPs with a native fashion model and both suit large, multi-site businesses; the choice usually comes down to the partner, the existing landscape and which suite modules the business needs. SAP S/4HANA for fashion and vertical business models a style as a generic article with variants from characteristics and adds segmentation; Infor M3 models a style with SKUs on X, Y and Z feature groups and keeps structures at style level.
| Aspect | Infor CloudSuite Fashion (M3) | SAP S/4HANA for fashion and vertical business |
|---|---|---|
| Style model | Style with SKUs generated through the M3 Product Configurator on feature groups X, Y, Z | Generic article with variants from characteristics (colour, size, fit) |
| Order entry | Fashion Matrix plug-ins on customer and distribution orders | Variant entry and distribution curves across sizes |
| BOM | At style level with style-colour or SKU exceptions | Check the variant BOM approach per release |
| Stock by quality or attribute | Lot and balance-ID attributes such as shade | Segmentation of demand and stock by attributes |
| Suite around it | Fashion PLM, CPQ, Nexus, WMS, e-commerce | Wider SAP landscape; see the SAP chapter |
| Deployment | Cloud subscription (single- or multi-tenant; check) | Private cloud or on-premise; public edition scope varies by release |
For the SAP side in detail, read the SAP S/4HANA Fashion chapter. Neither product covers sampling rounds, the T&A calendar, line-level floor capture or ISO 2859-1 AQL as standard, so both projects face the same decision about an operations layer. The comparison page sets all the ERPs in this guide side by side.
Part 3Design, area by area
10How should item types and materials be set up in Infor M3 for apparel?
Set up M3 item types by how each material is bought, stocked, costed and tracked: fabric, yarn, trims, packaging, subcontract services and finished styles each get their own item type, because the type drives numbering, costing and which attributes apply. M3's style settings document item types (CRS040) and the "Settings - Create Items" program (CRS760) as part of style setup.
| Material | Bought in | Used in | Track at receipt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knit fabric | kg | m | GSM, width, shade and dye lot, shrinkage |
| Woven fabric | m or yd | m | Width, weight, shade and dye lot, shrinkage |
| Yarn | kg, on cones | kg | Count, ply, composition, shade |
| Trims | Pieces, gross (144) | Pieces | Colour per colourway |
| Packaging | Pieces | Pieces | Buyer-specific printing |
| Buyer-supplied material | Received, not bought | As above | Held apart from stock value |
Put lot control on fabric and yarn, with the attributes the stores head listed in discovery. Most trims do not need lots. Buttons bought by the gross and issued by the piece convert through an alternate unit on the item (section 12).
With operations on top: the style, its bill of materials by category and its consumption are built in the operations layer. M3 still needs the item types and lot rules, because it holds stock value and payables.
11How does Infor M3 handle style, colour and size?
Infor M3 treats a style as the parent and each colour-size combination as an SKU, generated through the M3 Product Configurator on feature groups X, Y and Z. Infor's documentation defines a style as "a comprehensive term for a number of similar items" and an SKU as "the item(s) connected to a certain style".
The style and SKU setup documented by Infor uses these programs:
| Program | What it sets up |
|---|---|
| CRS582 | Feature groups X, Y and Z, required to use the matrix for SKU creation and order entry |
| PDS055 | Features (for example colour, size) |
| PDS050 | Options (for example NVY, S) |
| PDS056 | Options connected to a feature |
| CRS040 | Item types |
| MMS024 | Alias types (for example the buyer's own code) |
| CRS759 | User-defined style field headings |
| CRS760 | Settings for creating items, including numbering for styles and SKUs |
| CRS912 | Seasons |
Infor's example SKU code is VHF013-18-40-CO: the style code followed by size, colour and material, separated by hyphens. For order entry, the M3 Fashion Matrix plug-ins show SKUs with the X and Y dimensions in a grid, let the user change the Z option, and show line, column and grand totals. The customer-order plug-in works with Customer Order. Open (OIS100), Open Line (OIS101) and the toolbox (OIS300); a customer order header must exist in OIS100 first. A matching plug-in exists for distribution orders.
A style/colour/size matrix is a grid with colours on one axis and sizes on the other, into which the quantity for each combination is entered.
The polo as one style with five SKUs
Feature group X is colour, Y is size; Z (fit) is not used for this polo. The numbering rule follows Infor's pattern of style, then options.
| SKU | X (colour) | Y (size) | Ordered |
|---|---|---|---|
P2041-NVY-S | NVY | S | 300 |
P2041-NVY-M | NVY | M | 750 |
P2041-NVY-L | NVY | L | 900 |
P2041-NVY-XL | NVY | XL | 750 |
P2041-NVY-XXL | NVY | XXL | 300 |
| Style P2041 | 1 colour | 5 sizes | 3,000 |
In the matrix plug-in the merchandiser sees one row (NVY) and five columns, types the five quantities, and the grand total reads 3,000. If the buyer later adds white and black, the style grows to 3 × 5 = 15 SKUs without a new style.
Jeans on three feature groups: the SKU count
A five-pocket jean in three washes (X), waist 28 to 40 in even sizes (Y, 7 values) and inseam 30, 32 and 34 (Z, 3 values).
40 styles in the season = 40 × 63 = 2,520 SKUs
Generate only the combinations the business sells. Whether SKU generation can skip unwanted combinations depends on the configurator setup; test it with the partner on a real range before loading a season.
With operations on top: styles, colourways and size breakdowns live in the operations layer, and M3 holds the SKUs that are actually ordered, stocked and invoiced.
12How do you convert kilograms to metres for fabric in Infor M3?
M3 converts between units with an alternate unit of measure and a conversion factor per item, set in Item. Connect Alternate U/M (MMS015), so kg-to-metre works as standard only as one fixed factor per fabric item. Knit fabric is bought by weight and cut by length, and the true factor depends on each roll's GSM and width.
GSM means grams per square metre: the weight of one square metre of fabric.
180 GSM jersey, 1.80 m width → 1000 ÷ (180 × 1.80) = 3.086 m per kg
M3 also documents catch weight management, where a transaction carries an actual weight beside the quantity, with the alternate cost unit set in MMS015. Whether catch weight suits fabric rolls, holding metres as the quantity and the actual kilograms as the catch weight, is a design to test with your partner; we found no Infor document that describes it for fabric.
Three workable designs
| Design | How it works in M3 | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Stock and issue in kg | Basic unit kg; cutting works out metres | Accurate stock value; the BOM must be in kg per size |
| Stock in m, fixed factor | Basic unit m, alternate unit kg with one factor in MMS015 | Easy to read; wrong when a roll differs from nominal |
| Measured per lot | GSM and width as lot attributes; convert per lot, by extension or catch weight | Accurate; needs design and discipline at receipt |
Four rolls of "180 GSM" jersey against one conversion factor
| Roll | kg | Measured GSM | Width (m) | m per kg | Metres |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-101 | 25.0 | 176 | 1.82 | 3.122 | 78.0 |
| R-102 | 24.6 | 184 | 1.78 | 3.053 | 75.1 |
| R-103 | 25.3 | 181 | 1.80 | 3.069 | 77.7 |
| R-104 | 24.8 | 188 | 1.76 | 3.022 | 75.0 |
| Total | 99.7 | 305.8 |
Measured: 305.8 m → 1.9 m short on four rolls (0.6%)
On 925 kg: 925 × 3.086 = 2,855 m nominal, about 17 m less in reality
17 m is about 18 size-L polos (17 ÷ 0.95). The stock report says they can be cut; the cutting table says they cannot. Record GSM and width per roll as lot attributes and convert per lot.
13Can Infor M3 track fabric dye lots and shade?
Yes. M3 lets a collection of attributes be stored when a lot or balance ID is created in stock, and Infor's fashion documentation names shade among them, so each dye lot can be an M3 lot carrying its shade, GSM and width. A dye lot is a batch of fabric dyed together; fabric from two dye lots can differ in shade, so one garment must never mix them.
Attributes are created in Attribute. Open (ATS010) and assigned a category that controls their value type. An attribute kept at lot-master level holds one value per lot; an attribute kept at balance-ID level can differ within a lot. For dye lots, keep shade group at lot level and roll length or actual width at balance-ID level if rolls are tracked separately. M3 also documents viewing inventory by attribute and tracing lots.
A shade band is a set of approved shade references for one fabric colour, used to judge each new lot. M3 holds the result as an attribute; the judgement against the band happens at inspection.
Three dye lots with their lot attributes, and the cut plan
The order needs 2,856 m. The mill ships 933 kg (8 kg over the 925 kg ordered) as 2,880 m in three dye lots.
| Lot | Shade group | Metres | Cut from it | Used | Left |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | A | 1,210 | XXL 300 · XL 750 · M 23 · S 87 | 1,186.6 | 23.4 |
| B | B | 1,030 | L 900 · S 213 | 1,029.7 | 0.3 |
| C | C | 640 | M 727 | 639.8 | 0.2 |
| Total | 2,880 | 3,000 pieces | 2,856 | 24 |
Lot B: 900 × 0.95 + 213 × 0.82 = 855 + 174.66 = 1,029.66
Lot C: 727 × 0.88 = 639.76
M3 carries the lot and its shade on every receipt and issue. The rule that one cut uses one lot, and the cut plan itself, are operations work (section 24).
With operations on top: shade bands per fabric, the measured lot record and the incoming inspection that carries the dye lot sit in the operations layer. M3 still holds the lot on receipts and issues.
14Can Infor M3 hold one bill of materials for a whole style?
Yes. Infor's fashion documentation says product structures (bill of materials and bill of operations) can be maintained from style level, with exceptions at style-colour or SKU level where needed. That suits apparel well: one structure for the polo, colour exceptions for thread and buttons, and SKU exceptions for fabric that grows with size.
Marker efficiency is the share of fabric in a cutting marker that ends up in garment pieces. Shrinkage is fabric lost in washing or finishing. Keep them apart in the source table, even if M3 receives one combined quantity per SKU.
A style-level BOM with SKU exceptions for fabric
| Level | Component | Quantity | Pieces | Metres |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Style P2041 | Body fabric (base size M) | 0.88 m | 750 | 660 |
| SKU exception S | Body fabric | 0.82 m | 300 | 246 |
| SKU exception L | Body fabric | 0.95 m | 900 | 855 |
| SKU exception XL | Body fabric | 1.02 m | 750 | 765 |
| SKU exception XXL | Body fabric | 1.10 m | 300 | 330 |
| By size | 3,000 | 2,856 | ||
| Style level only | 0.88 m for every size | 3,000 | 2,640 | |
| Style-colour NVY | Buttons, 15 mm navy | 3 pcs | 3,000 | 9,000 pcs |
Forgetting the four SKU exceptions under-buys by 2,856 − 2,640 = 216 m, or 7.6%: roughly 227 size-L polos with no fabric (216 ÷ 0.95). The M3 model makes the exception easy to hold; the numbers still have to come from CAD, so generate the exceptions from the consumption table rather than typing them.
With operations on top: the consumption engine (marker efficiency, shrinkage, woven construction) and the net-to-buy across the order book run in the operations layer, which passes the purchase quantity to M3.
15How do you model cutting, sewing and finishing in Infor M3, and where does line planning live?
Model cutting, sewing, finishing and packing as work centers with operations and times on the style's bill of operations; plan capacity with the M3 Planning and Scheduling Workbench if it is licensed. A work center is a place where operations run, with its own capacity and rate.
Infor documents two planning tools for fashion. The Planning Workbench works at facility level over a medium horizon (Infor's documentation says 3 to 4 months), showing capacity and loading across work centers and facilities, and lists moving orders to or from subcontractors among the planning decisions. The Scheduling Workbench is a decision-support tool for scheduling manufacturing orders against finite capacity and material flow. Neither is documented as operator-level line balancing or hourly output capture.
The polo's operations, minutes and line capacity
| Work center | Operations | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Cutting | Spread, cut, number, bundle | 1.20 |
| Sewing line | Shoulder, placket, collar, sleeves, side seams, cuffs, hem, buttons | 13.50 |
| Finishing | Trim and inspect, press, fold, tag and bag | 3.30 |
| Total | 18.00 |
7,200 ÷ 13.50 = 533 polos a day → 3,000 ÷ 533.3 = 5.6 line-days
CM: 18 × USD 0.07 = USD 1.26 a polo · 3,000 × 1.26 = USD 3,780
In M3 the operations and times give the labour cost of the manufacturing order. The 5.6 line-days, which line, and the hourly output are planning and floor work.
With operations on top: the planning heat-map (lines and subcontractors, 52 weeks), production orders with job cards per department and the WIP board run in the operations layer.
16Where do sampling, approvals and the T&A calendar live in an Infor project?
We found no M3 object for sample rounds, buyer verdicts or a T&A calendar; the options are Infor Fashion PLM if it covers your process (check with Infor), an extension, or an operations layer. A PP (pre-production) sample is a garment in bulk fabric and trims that the buyer approves as the reference for production. A T&A (time and action) calendar lists an order's milestones with planned dates worked back from ex-factory, actual dates and owners.
Whatever holds sampling must record each round (sent date, courier, pieces, comments, verdict), link the approved round to the spec version it approved, and block the next step until the approval exists.
The polo order's approval calendar, worked back from ex-factory
| Date | Milestone | If it slips |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct | Lab dip round 3 approved | Bulk dyeing cannot start |
| 10 Nov | Bulk fabric in-house | Cutting waits |
| 14 Nov | PP sample approved | Cutting cannot start |
| 17 Nov | Cutting starts | |
| 12 Dec | Final AQL inspection | Shipment held |
| 15 Dec | Ex-factory |
Cutting starts 3 days after the PP approval and 7 days after the fabric arrives; the final inspection is 3 days before ex-factory. A merchandiser needs these dependencies in one place every morning.
With operations on top: dev approvals (lab dip, strike-off, sample, shipping mark) with rounds, courier details and the buyer's verdict, the T&A calendar with its critical path, and the PP approval that locks the style version for the order live in the operations layer.
17Does Infor M3 support subcontracting for CMT, embroidery or washing?
Yes, in M3 core: a subcontract order is a purchase order for an operation done by a subcontractor, either tied to a manufacturing order or run without one. Infor's documentation says a subcontract operation runs on a work center with resource type 2, and creating the manufacturing order creates a planned purchase order for the operation in Planned Purchase Order. Open (PPS170). How CloudSuite Fashion configures this for multi-step garment chains was not documented in what we reviewed; demo it.
The "without manufacturing order" variant is documented for companies without in-house production that manage operation chains with material bought directly or sent from their own stock, which also suits a brand sending fabric to a CMT unit.
Embroidery as a subcontract operation on the manufacturing order
| Step | In M3 | Pieces |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing order for 3,000 polos includes an embroidery operation on a resource-type-2 work center | Planned purchase order in PPS170 | 3,000 |
| Cut fronts sent with a 1% allowance | Material to the subcontractor | 3,030 |
| Good fronts returned | Operation reported | 3,004 |
| Rejects (thread break, misplacement) | Recorded with a reason | 26 |
| Balance at the embroiderer | Inside the 30-piece allowance | 0 |
How rejects and the allowance are recorded per subcontractor is design work; test it with real counts before go-live.
With operations on top: subcontract steps sit on the production order in the operations layer, and subcontractors appear on the planning heat-map beside the factory's own lines. M3 receives the subcontract purchase order and the payable.
18How does Infor M3 handle garment costing and landed cost on imported fabric?
M3 costs purchased items with a costing model built from costing elements, and lets charges such as freight be added to a purchase order and matched against supplier or third-party invoices in Supplier Invoice Match GR Line (APS360). Whether and how those charges flow into each fabric item's stock value in your setup is a question to confirm with the partner. The garment costing sheet used to quote a buyer comes before any SKU exists, so it usually lives outside M3.
A landed cost is every cost of bringing goods to the factory beyond the supplier's price: freight, insurance, duty, clearing and bank charges. In M3, each charge is a costing element; for each element that represents a charge, up to five object types (for example warehouse, delivery method and country) can select a different rate.
A quotation cost build for the polo (illustrative, USD per piece)
| Line | How it is worked out | USD |
|---|---|---|
| Body fabric | 0.31 kg at 4.20 per kg, plus 6% cutting loss | 1.38 |
| Collar and cuffs | 1 set | 0.25 |
| Trims | Buttons, thread, labels, polybag | 0.32 |
| Embroidery | Subcontractor price | 0.18 |
| CM | 18 minutes at 0.07 | 1.26 |
| Testing | Spread over the order | 0.10 |
| Overhead | 12% of CM | 0.15 |
| Freight to port, documents | 0.12 | |
| Finance cost | 3% | 0.11 |
| Margin | 10% | 0.39 |
| FOB | 4.26 |
Purchase charges on the imported fabric
The navy jersey (925 kg, USD 3,885.00) and the rib sets (3,060 sets, USD 765.00; 76.5 kg) arrive in one shipment under temporary admission, so duty is zero. Each charge is a costing element on the purchase order, matched in APS360 when the invoice arrives. Figures are illustrative.
| Costing element | USD | Spread by | Jersey | Rib sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sea freight | 420.00 | Weight | 387.92 | 32.08 |
| Clearing and port | 180.00 | Value | 150.39 | 29.61 |
| LC bank charges | 95.00 | Value | 79.37 | 15.63 |
| Total | 695.00 | 617.68 | 77.32 |
Value share = 3,885 ÷ 4,650 = 83.55% → 180 × 0.8355 = 150.39 · 95 × 0.8355 = 79.37
Jersey landed = 3,885.00 + 617.68 = 4,502.68 → ÷ 925 = USD 4.87 per kg
At USD 4.87 the fabric line of Example 13 becomes 0.31 × 4.87 × 1.06 = USD 1.60, 0.22 more per polo and USD 660 on the order. Quote on landed material cost.
With operations on top: the cost engine (fabric, trims, decoration, CMT, overhead, margin to FOB, with landed cost and dated exchange rates), the standard cost sheet and quotations with approval thresholds run in the operations layer. M3 holds the charges that actually hit the purchase orders.
19Does Infor M3 support AQL inspection for garments?
M3's Quality Management System (QMS) creates quality inspection (QI) requests per item and lot, with tests and specifications (QMS200), for received purchased goods, manufacturing and returns; we did not find ISO 2859-1 sampling tables in its documentation, so AQL sample sizes and acceptance numbers need an extension or a separate system. AQL (acceptance quality limit) inspection checks a random sample from a lot and accepts or rejects the lot on the number of defects found.
The final inspection sample for 3,000 polos
| Step | Lookup (ISO 2859-1, normal, single) | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Lot size | 3,000 falls in 1,201–3,200 | That band |
| Code letter | General level II | K |
| Sample size | Code letter K | 125 pieces |
| Major, AQL 2.5 | Sample of 125 | Accept 7, reject 8 |
| Minor, AQL 4.0 | Sample of 125 | Accept 10, reject 11 |
A QI request can hold the result and the release decision. The sample size and acceptance numbers have to come from the ISO tables, at the buyer's level.
With operations on top: typed inspections (incoming, cutting, PP, DUPRO, final AQL, pre-shipment, measurement), the AQL engine on ISO 2859-1 at the buyer's level, CAPA, needle and metal control and quality grades run in the operations layer. M3 sees the delivery once it is cleared.
20How do you handle cartons and shipping documents with Infor?
Packing and dispatch run in M3 (and in the suite WMS if licensed), while buyer-specific carton rules, labels and packing-list layouts usually need design per buyer. Infor documents creating packing instructions and making them available to suppliers, which helps a brand; confirm the factory-side carton flow in a demo.
Packing 3,000 polos into cartons, one dye lot per carton
| Size and lot | Pieces | Full cartons of 10 | Part carton |
|---|---|---|---|
| S, lot A | 87 | 8 | 1 of 7 |
| S, lot B | 213 | 21 | 1 of 3 |
| M, lot A | 23 | 2 | 1 of 3 |
| M, lot C | 727 | 72 | 1 of 7 |
| L, lot B | 900 | 90 | none |
| XL, lot A | 750 | 75 | none |
| XXL, lot A | 300 | 30 | none |
| Total | 3,000 | 298 | 4 (20 pieces) |
298 full cartons hold 2,980 pieces and four part cartons hold 20, so the shipment is 302 cartons, not the 300 a size-only plan predicts. Agree part cartons with the buyer before packing.
With operations on top: shipments per delivery, packing and cartonisation, and ship clearance against the buyer's terms run in the operations layer. M3 receives the dispatch and raises the invoice.
21How does Infor handle multi-currency, letters of credit, prepayments and chargebacks?
Multi-currency is expected of an enterprise ERP like M3, but we did not verify the fashion suite's handling of prepayments, letters of credit or chargeback reason codes in Infor's documentation; confirm each with the partner and test it with the scenarios in section 27. A letter of credit is a bank's promise to pay the exporter when documents matching its terms are presented; under ICC's UCP 600, documents are presented within 21 calendar days after shipment unless the credit says otherwise.
Down payment, letter of credit and exchange difference
The numbers finance must be able to reproduce in Infor, whatever the setup. The factory keeps its books in EGP; rates are illustrative.
Down payment 30% = USD 3,834.00 · balance = USD 8,946.00
Invoice at 48.80 = EGP 436,564.80 · paid at 49.10 = EGP 439,248.60
Exchange gain = 8,946.00 × 0.30 = EGP 2,683.80
A chargeback is an amount a buyer deducts from a payment for a claimed failure. If the balance were paid on open account less a USD 100.00 label claim and a 1% late-ASN claim (89.46), the factory would receive 8,946.00 − 189.46 = USD 8,756.54, and each deduction needs its own reason code.
With operations on top: finance stays in Infor in full. The operations layer sends the orders, deliveries and purchase requests that invoices and payables are built on; no money amounts travel through its ERP API.
22Does Infor CloudSuite Fashion support e-invoicing in garment-exporting countries?
We did not verify Infor's localisation coverage for garment-exporting countries in this guide, so check your country with Infor and the partner before signing. Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, Vietnam and Morocco each have their own e-invoicing, VAT and export rules, and free-zone or temporary-admission factories often report material import and re-export to customs in a local format. Test a real e-invoice end to end in the test tenant before go-live.
Part 4Build
23In what order should Infor M3 be configured for a garment business?
Configure from the ledger outward: company, currencies and accounts; then units, item types, features and options; then attributes and lot rules; then costing and purchase charges; then work centers, subcontracting and quality; and only then styles and SKUs. The program codes below are those named in Infor's documentation; confirm each on your tenant.
| # | Configure | Where (M3 program) | Why at this point |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Company, accounts, currencies, taxes | Per partner setup | Every later document posts here |
| 2 | Item types | CRS040 | Styles and materials need their types |
| 3 | Feature groups X, Y, Z | CRS582 | Required for the matrix |
| 4 | Features, options, connections | PDS055, PDS050, PDS056 | Colours and sizes before any style |
| 5 | Seasons, style fields, numbering | CRS912, CRS759, CRS760 | SKU codes are generated from these |
| 6 | Alias types for buyer codes | MMS024 | Buyer style numbers from day one |
| 7 | Attributes for lots | ATS010 | Fabric must carry shade, GSM, width |
| 8 | Alternate units per item | MMS015 | kg, m, gross, pairs |
| 9 | Purchase settings and costing elements | PPS096 and the costing model | Charges on fabric POs |
| 10 | Work centers incl. subcontract (resource type 2) | Per partner setup | Operations need work centers |
| 11 | Quality tests and specifications | QMS200 | QI requests at receipt |
| 12 | Fashion Matrix plug-in on customer orders | OIS300 personalisation, per Infor's steps | Grid entry for merchandisers |
| 13 | Master data: partners, materials, styles, structures | Loads (section 26) | Last, on final settings |
24Which extensions does an Infor apparel implementation usually need?
An apparel M3 project that keeps operations inside Infor usually needs extensions for per-lot fabric conversion, cut control, AQL, quantity tolerance, letters of credit and buyer documents; the extension tools allowed depend on your tenant, so agree them with Infor and the partner first. Infor's own Fashion Matrix plug-in documentation uses a personalisation script on OIS300, which shows that personalisation is one route; what else a single-tenant or multi-tenant subscription allows is a question to settle before design.
| Extension | Purpose | Fit-gap lines | Needed with operations on top? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric conversion per lot | kg to metres from GSM and width attributes | 20 | No |
| Consumption loader | SKU-level fabric exceptions from a CAD table | 12, 13 | No |
| Cut control | One lot per cut; cut orders and bundles | 23, 30, 31 | No |
| Sampling and T&A | Rounds, verdicts, milestones | 10, 36 | No |
| AQL | ISO 2859-1 sample sizes and acceptance numbers | 38 | No |
| Quantity tolerance | Over and under-shipment check | 43 | No |
| Letters of credit | Terms, dates, document checks | 48 | Yes |
| Buyer documents and labels | Packing lists, labels, ASN per buyer | 44, 46 | Partly |
Every extension must survive Infor's cloud upgrades, so keep the list short.
25Which systems does an Infor apparel implementation integrate with?
An Infor apparel project typically connects to PLM, a shop-floor system, EDI with retailers, banks and an operations layer, most often through Infor ION and the ION API Gateway. Each connection needs one writer per field, links stored on permanent keys, and receivers that are safe to call twice.
| Record | Source of truth | Goes to M3 as |
|---|---|---|
| Style, spec, measurements | Fashion PLM or the operations layer (one of them) | Style and SKUs, once released |
| Buyer order | Operations layer, or EDI into M3 | Customer order |
| Material requirements | Operations layer | Purchase requests that become M3 purchase orders |
| Receipts, lots, attributes | M3, with measurements from the operations layer | Receipts |
| WIP and output | Floor system or operations layer | Summarised reporting |
| Quality | Operations layer | Clearance to ship |
| Invoices, payments | Infor | Native |
Where the disagreement is between two systems, show it to a person on a review list. Never overwrite silently.
Part 5Data migration
26How do you migrate apparel data into Infor M3?
Migrate only open and active data (active styles and SKUs, open orders, open purchase orders, stock by lot with attributes) in dependency order, and have each department head sign the loaded totals. Loads usually run through M3 API programs or the load tools your partner uses; confirm which tools your subscription includes.
| # | Object | Scope | Signed by |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Features, options, seasons, attributes | Final design | Merchandising head |
| 2 | Customers and suppliers | Active in two seasons | Merchandising, purchasing |
| 3 | Materials | In active styles or stock | Stores head |
| 4 | Styles and generated SKUs | Active and carry-over | Merchandising head |
| 5 | Style-level structures with exceptions | Styles with open orders | Production, CAD lead |
| 6 | Stock by lot, with attributes | Counted at cut-off | Stores head, finance |
| 7 | Open purchase and customer orders | Open quantities only | Purchasing, merchandising |
| 8 | Open receivables and payables | Per invoice at cut-off | Finance head |
Map old size labels to M3 options one scale at a time, merge duplicate materials, and give every roll in stock its lot and shade before the count. A cut-off rule states the exact moment after which every transaction is entered in Infor.
Part 6Testing
27How should you test an Infor apparel implementation end to end?
Test with end-to-end scenarios that follow one real order from the buyer's PO to cash, run by key users on migrated data, each step with an expected result written before the test starts.
| # | Scenario | Expected result, in short |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | FOB order to payment | Order, purchase, receipt, production, delivery, invoice and payment reconcile (Example 18) |
| T2 | CMT order with buyer fabric | Buyer fabric never enters stock value |
| T3 | Prepack order | Packs, pieces and cartons agree |
| T4 | Shade split in cutting | No cut mixes lots (Example 19) |
| T5 | Subcontract embroidery with loss | Out, back and rejects balance (Example 12) |
| T6 | Short shipment within tolerance | Invoiced on shipped quantity |
| T7 | Over-shipment | Blocked above tolerance or needs a named approval |
| T8 | Seconds sale | Seconds valued and sold apart |
| T9 | LC discrepancy | A late shipment date is flagged before presentation |
| T10 | Chargeback | Deductions posted by reason |
| T11 | Mid-season spec revision | Open order keeps its approved structure |
| T12 | Cancelled order with committed materials | Bought fabric and open POs listed for decision |
| T13 | FX at month-end | Differences posted as finance decided |
Test script: the polo order from customer order to cash
| Step | Action | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Create the customer order header in OIS100; enter quantities in the Fashion Matrix: S 300, M 750, L 900, XL 750, XXL 300 | Five SKU lines, grand total 3,000, value USD 12,780.00 |
| 2 | Record the 30% prepayment as finance designed | USD 3,834.00 received against the order |
| 3 | Release the purchase order for 925 kg jersey; follow it in PPS200 | Open PO for 925 kg with its costing elements |
| 4 | Receive 933 kg in lots A, B, C with shade, GSM and width | Receipt refused without lot and mandatory attributes |
| 5 | QI request on the receipt passes | Lots released to stock |
| 6 | Match the charges in APS360 | Charges of USD 695.00 matched to their invoices |
| 7 | Release the manufacturing orders; the embroidery PO appears in PPS170 | Planned subcontract PO for 3,000 |
| 8 | Report production and deliver 3,000 polos in 302 cartons | Delivery for 3,000 |
| 9 | Invoice the balance | USD 12,780.00 − 3,834.00 = 8,946.00 due |
| 10 | Register payment at a different rate | Exchange difference posted |
Test script: shade split at cutting
| Step | Action | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Issue lot A to the cut for XXL 300, XL 750, M 23, S 87 | Accepted; 1,186.6 m issued |
| 2 | Try to add lot B to the same cut | Refused, naming both lots |
| 3 | Issue lot B for L 900 and S 213; lot C for M 727 | Accepted; 1,029.7 m and 639.8 m |
| 4 | Return leftovers per lot | A 23.4 m, B 0.3 m, C 0.2 m, each keeping its lot and shade |
Step 2 needs cut control (section 24) or an operations layer; lot attributes alone do not stop a user picking the wrong lot.
Test script: short shipment within tolerance
Scenario T6: the buyer allows ±3% and the factory ships 2,940 pieces, 60 short (2.0%).
| Step | Action | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deliver 2,940 of 3,000 | 2.0% short, inside 3% |
| 2 | Close the remaining 60 without a backorder | No open quantity |
| 3 | Invoice | 2,940 × 4.26 = USD 12,524.40, less 3,834.00 = 8,690.40 due |
| 4 | Repeat with 2,900 | 3.3% short; blocked or needs a named approval |
Part 7Training, go-live and hypercare
28How should training, cut-over and hypercare run on an Infor go-live?
Train each role only on the programs and scenarios it will use, rehearse the cut-over once in full, go live between seasons, and keep the partner in close support until the first month-end close in Infor is done. Hypercare is the period after go-live when the project team fixes issues daily.
| Role | What they learn | Pass when they can |
|---|---|---|
| Merchandisers | Customer orders with the Fashion Matrix, order changes | Enter the polo order from the buyer PO without help |
| Purchasing | Purchase orders, charges, invoice matching | Buy 925 kg of jersey and match the charges |
| Stores | Receipts with lots and attributes, issues, returns | Receive three dye lots with shade, GSM and width |
| Planners | Manufacturing orders, subcontract orders, workbench | Release the polo orders and the embroidery PO |
| Quality | QI requests, tests, release | Pass and release a fabric lot |
| Finance | Invoices, payments, currency, month-end | Take the polo order from prepayment to closed |
- Cut-over. Freeze master data a week ahead, stop receipts in the old system at a set time, count fabric by lot and roll, load, and let the sponsor decide go or no-go on signed totals.
- Timing. Avoid shipment peaks, financial year-end and audits.
- Hypercare. Practitioners commonly plan four to eight weeks; that range is judgement, not a standard. Nobody leaves before the first month-end close is done.
Part 8Risks
29What are the most common mistakes when implementing Infor for apparel?
The most common mistakes are buying more suite than the business can absorb, fixing feature groups too late, relying on the style-level structure without SKU exceptions for fabric, one conversion factor per fabric, and two masters for the style (PLM and an operations tool). The list comes from implementation practice and from the general failure modes in the methodology.
- Suite bought, not scoped.Modules on the order form with no owner and no fit-gap line.
- Feature groups changed after go-live.Adding fit or inseam later means new SKUs for every affected style.
- Style-level fabric only.No SKU exceptions, so large sizes run short (Example 9).
- One conversion factor per fabric.Stock value looks right while the cutting room runs short (Example 7).
- Shade as an optional attribute.Lots received without shade cannot be controlled at cutting.
- Two style masters.Fashion PLM and an operations layer both editing the spec.
- Planning Workbench mistaken for line balancing.Medium-horizon facility planning is not hourly floor control.
- Tenancy assumed.Extensions designed for single-tenant freedoms on a multi-tenant subscription, or the reverse.
- Linking on editable text.Integrations that match on descriptions or buyer references break when someone edits them.
The general failure modes, mapped to Infor
| Symptom | How it shows in Infor | Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| SKU swamp | Every combination generated for every style | Generate only sold combinations (section 11) |
| Large sizes short of fabric | No SKU exceptions | Generated exceptions (section 14) |
| Shade mixing | Any lot can be issued | Cut control (section 13) |
| Costing illusion | Standard cost with no quote beside it | Quote and actuals per order (section 18) |
| Goods lost at subcontractors | One subcontract step for a chain | An operation per processor (section 17) |
| Floor data never arrives | Office programs on the floor | Floor screens or a floor system |
| Big-bang in peak season | Go-live in a shipment window | Go live between seasons (section 28) |
30What must be decided before an Infor apparel go-live?
Decide the suite modules, the tenancy, the feature groups per product family, the lot attributes, the fabric unit design, the costing elements, and which system owns style, sampling, T&A, floor capture and AQL, because each is expensive to change once transactions exist.
- Which suite modules are licensed and who owns each.
- Single-tenant or multi-tenant, and the extension tools that allow.
- Feature groups X, Y, Z per product family, and SKU numbering.
- Lot and balance-ID attributes, and which are mandatory at receipt.
- The fabric unit design and how kg converts to metres.
- Costing elements for import charges and how they reach stock value.
- Where style and tech pack live: Fashion PLM or the operations layer.
- Where sampling, T&A, floor capture and AQL live.
- How buyer-supplied fabric stays out of stock value.
- The quantity tolerance rule and who may approve outside it.
- Which ION API Gateway access the integrations need.
Part 9Integration and API
31How do you integrate with Infor CloudSuite Fashion through the ION API Gateway?
Integrate through the Infor ION API Gateway, which authenticates callers with OAuth 2.0 and forwards REST requests to M3's API programs; a backend service logs in with a service account under the resource owner grant, using the client ID and secret Infor issues in an .ionapi file. Infor describes the gateway as a reverse proxy that accepts HTTP requests and passes them to the target application.
| OAuth 2.0 grant (Infor OS documentation) | Suitable for |
|---|---|
| Authorization code | Native mobile or desktop apps and web apps |
| Implicit | Single-page apps |
| Resource owner | Server-to-server access, for example a backend service client, with a service account |
| SAML bearer | Apps inside Infor Ming.le with SSO |
The Infor documentation we checked does not list the client-credentials grant; confirm with Infor which grants your tenant offers. Infor publishes sample code in the ion-api-sdk repository on GitHub.
- API programs. M3 exposes MI programs such as PPS200MI, Infor's purchase order information interface for headers, lines, transactions, addresses and texts. Community material shows the REST path as
m3api-rest/execute/<program>/<transaction>; take the exact path from your tenant's ION API catalogue. - Identifiers. Store M3's own keys (company plus order or item number), never a description or a buyer reference a user can edit. Check that purchase order numbers come from an M3 number series and are never typed by hand.
- Push and pull. ION also moves business documents between applications. Which events your tenant can publish to an outside system is not something we verified; polling for changes stays the dependable baseline, so make the receiving side safe to call twice.
- Limits. We found no published rate limit for the gateway; ask Infor for the limits on your tenant and batch loads accordingly.
One purchase request, from MerchandiserOS to M3 and back
- In MerchandiserOS, request
PR-1042for 925 kg of navy jersey is approved. - The Infor-side integration collects it:
GET /api/v1/erp/documentsreturns the request with quantity, unit and supplier code. - The integration creates the purchase order in M3; M3 assigns PO number 4000457 in company 100.
- The integration sends the answer back:
POST /api/v1/erp/po-status
Idempotency-Key: m3-100-4000457-released
{"rows": [{"request_ref": "PR-1042",
"erp_po_id": "100/4000457",
"erp_po_number": "4000457",
"status": "released",
"date": "2026-10-21"}]}
- A person in MerchandiserOS approves it on the ERP review list. The request now shows "M3 PO 4000457, released".
- The integration reads the decision back from
GET /api/v1/erp/proposals/{id}.
The id combines company and PO number because that pair is M3's key; agree the format once and never change it. The Idempotency-Key means a retried call does not create a second link. No price travels in this exchange. A factory that does not want to program can use the file exchange instead: the same rows as a file, approved on the same review list.
Part 10If you don't manufacture
32Is Infor CloudSuite Fashion good for a clothing brand, a buying agent or an own-label retailer?
Infor CloudSuite Fashion fits large clothing brands and own-label retailers well on the commercial side, because the suite pairs the M3 ERP with Fashion PLM, the Infor Nexus supply chain network, a WMS, demand forecasting and e-commerce; a buying agent needs far less of it. What none of them get as standard is the daily follow-up of development, samples, T&A and inspections across many outside factories.
Who they are
- A brand or wholesaler designs and sells, while factories make for it on FOB or CMT terms.
- A buying agent or buying house sources for buyers on commission and holds no stock.
- An own-label retailer develops its own label and buys it from factories, usually as private label sourcing.
What they need from Infor, and what to skip
As an ERP for fashion brands, Infor should carry the money and the goods flow, not the factory floor.
| Need | Brand or retailer | Buying agent | In Infor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase orders to factories (FOB or CMT) | Yes | No; the buyer places them | M3 purchase orders; subcontract orders without a manufacturing order for CMT (section 17) |
| Landed cost and duty | Yes | No | Costing elements and charges on purchase orders (section 18) |
| Vendor payments and letters of credit | Yes | No | Payables; LC terms need design |
| Wholesale sales orders by matrix | Yes | No | Customer orders with the Fashion Matrix |
| EDI 850, 856, 810 and chargebacks | When selling to retailers | No | Check the EDI route with Infor |
| Commission accounting | Pays it | Earns it: a commission invoice to the buyer, no stock, no goods payables or receivables | Check commission handling in your version |
| Multi-currency | Yes | Yes | Standard in an enterprise ERP |
| Trading partner network | Often | Sometimes | Infor Nexus |
| Development and tech packs | Yes | Follows it | Fashion PLM, if licensed |
Skip the manufacturing modules: work centers, manufacturing orders, the Planning and Scheduling Workbench and shop-floor extensions. A brand that runs no factory does not need them, and a buying agent needs little beyond accounts and commission invoicing. As buying house ERP or sourcing agent software, the full suite is heavy, in our judgement.
What Infor handles poorly for them
- Development and sampling with many factories, round by round, with the buyer's verdicts.
- T&A across factories, with one critical path per order.
- Following production that happens outside, in factories that do not run the brand's ERP.
- Inspections at the vendor, with AQL at the buyer's level.
- One status per order across many factories and many buyers.
The MerchandiserOS model for brands and agents
MerchandiserOS runs development, samples and approvals, the T&A, the orders placed with factories, sourcing, the planning view across subcontracted factories, quality inspections and shipping follow-up. Infor keeps the books. Its workspace set-ups include "Brand" and "Buying agent". Retail back-office work (stores, POS, allocation, open-to-buy) is outside MerchandiserOS's scope; for that, a brand or retailer uses Infor's retail and e-commerce modules or another retail system.
The polo seen from the brand and the buying agent
The brand places 3,000 polos with the factory at USD 4.26 FOB through a buying agent paid 5% of FOB. Freight, duty and clearing are illustrative; the duty rate depends on the country and the goods.
| Line | How it is worked out | USD |
|---|---|---|
| FOB value | 3,000 × 4.26 | 12,780.00 |
| Buying agent commission | 12,780.00 × 5% (illustrative rate) | 639.00 |
| Ocean freight and insurance | Illustrative | 540.00 |
| Import duty | 12% of FOB (illustrative) = 12,780.00 × 12% | 1,533.60 |
| Clearing and delivery to the warehouse | Illustrative | 210.00 |
| Landed cost in the brand's warehouse | 12,780.00 + 639.00 + 540.00 + 1,533.60 + 210.00 | 15,702.60 |
Uplift on FOB = 15,702.60 ÷ 12,780.00 = 1.229, about 23% above FOB
In the brand's M3, the factory PO carries 12,780.00, and freight, duty, clearing and commission are costing elements on it. The agent invoices the brand USD 639.00 as a service; the agent's books show a receivable of 639.00 and no stock. Whether a buying commission enters the customs value is a customs question, so check it with your broker.
For a lighter ERP around the same model, see the NetSuite chapter or apparel-specific ERPs.
Part 11The recommended model
33The operations layer: what runs on top of Infor
The simplest way to run a garment business on Infor is to let Infor keep the books and run operations, from style to shipment, in a system built for apparel. Parts 3 to 7 of this chapter show what it takes to configure and extend M3 for garment production instead.
The polo order with operations on top
| Step | In MerchandiserOS | What Infor sees |
|---|---|---|
| Tech pack and quote | Style P-2041, graded measurements, cost build at 4.26 FOB | Nothing yet |
| Samples | Three lab dip rounds, strike-off, PP approved 14 Nov and locked to the style version | Nothing |
| Order | 3,000 pieces by size, T&A to 15 Dec | Customer order for invoicing |
| Procurement | 925 kg jersey, trims, embroidery; receipts measured per lot | Purchase orders, receipts, payables |
| Production and floor | Line booked, cut by dye lot, job cards, output per hour | Material issues for stock value |
| Quality | Final AQL, 125 pieces; only first quality ships | Nothing |
| Logistics | 302 cartons, ship clearance against buyer terms | Dispatch and invoice |
Who does what
| Area | Runs in MerchandiserOS | Recorded in Infor |
|---|---|---|
| Style | Versions and frozen snapshots, tech pack sections, graded POM with tolerances, colourways and lab dips, a classified two-level BOM, the consumption engine, make-type aware | Style and SKUs once released |
| Costing and approvals | Cost engine to FOB with landed cost and dated FX, standard cost sheet, quotations, approval gates with thresholds | Nothing until an order exists |
| Orders | Buyer POs as parent records, size×colour breakdown, tolerance band, provisional→confirmed quantity, per-shipment deliveries, ratio packs; an approved order-level PP round locks the style version | The customer order, for invoicing |
| Development approvals | Lab dip, strike-off, sample and shipping mark, with rounds, parcel and courier details, buyer verdict and T&A wiring | Nothing |
| Sourcing and materials | Suppliers with qualification, materials master, purchase requests → POs → GRN → issue and return, MRP net-to-buy, shade bands, measured lot record per receipt, incoming inspection with the dye lot | Financial POs, payables, stock value |
| Planning and production | 52-week heat-map of lines and subcontractors, production orders, job cards per department, floor capture, WIP board, T&A with critical path | Material movements |
| Quality | Typed inspections, AQL on ISO 2859-1 at the buyer's level, CAPA, needle and metal control, quality grades | Nothing |
| Logistics | Per-delivery shipments, packing and cartonisation, ship clearance against buyer terms | Dispatch and invoice |
What the Infor project no longer needs to build
- Per-lot fabric conversion and cut control.
- Consumption loaders for SKU-level fabric exceptions.
- Sampling, approvals and T&A (and possibly the Fashion PLM licence).
- AQL, quantity tolerance and shop-floor capture.
- Planning extensions for line-level loading.
What stays in the Infor project: finance design, letters of credit, chargebacks, local statutory reports, e-invoicing and the connection.
How they connect
- Infor ↔ MerchandiserOS. Through the MerchandiserOS ERP API (an integration login, a review list where a person approves every inbound change, an approver per kind of change, and a "what changed" feed) or a file exchange with no programming. Money amounts stay in Infor.
- Shop floor. MerchandiserOS's own floor screens, or Garment.io: MerchandiserOS integrates with Garment.io, sending orders and styles and reading floor output and actual minutes back.
·Frequently asked questions about Infor CloudSuite Fashion
The questions consultants, factory managers and brands ask most often. Each answer stands on its own.
What is Infor CloudSuite Fashion?
Infor CloudSuite Fashion is Infor's cloud suite for apparel, footwear, accessories and home-textile companies. Infor lists a fashion and apparel ERP, Fashion PLM, CPQ, demand forecasting, the Infor Nexus supply chain network, a warehouse management system, sustainability and compliance tools, e-commerce and the cloud platform as parts of it. Its documentation sits under Infor M3.
Is Infor CloudSuite Fashion built on Infor M3?
Yes. The CloudSuite Fashion documentation is published as part of the Infor M3 documentation, and its fashion features (styles, SKUs, the fashion matrix, style-level product structures) are M3 features. The suite adds applications such as Fashion PLM and Infor Nexus around the M3 core.
How does Infor M3 handle style, colour and size?
Infor M3 treats a style as the parent and each colour-size combination as an SKU. Feature groups X, Y and Z (set up in CRS582) define the axes, features and options define the values, and the M3 Product Configurator generates the SKUs. The Fashion Matrix plug-ins then show the X and Y axes as a grid on customer and distribution orders, with line, column and grand totals.
Can Infor M3 hold one bill of materials for a whole style?
Yes. Infor's fashion documentation says product structures can be maintained from style level with exceptions at style-colour or SKU level. For apparel, keep common components at style level, colour-specific trims at style-colour level, and fabric at SKU level so that each size carries its own consumption.
Can Infor M3 track fabric dye lots and shade?
Yes. M3 stores a collection of attributes when a lot or balance ID is created, and Infor names shade among them. Treat each dye lot as an M3 lot with shade, GSM and width attributes. Preventing a cut from mixing lots still needs an extension or an operations layer.
How do you convert kilograms to metres for fabric in Infor M3?
M3 converts through an alternate unit of measure with a conversion factor per item, set in MMS015, which gives one fixed factor per fabric. Because the real factor, 1000 ÷ (GSM × width in metres), changes per roll, record GSM and width as lot attributes and convert per lot, by extension, by a tested catch-weight design, or in an operations layer.
Does Infor M3 support subcontracting for CMT, embroidery or washing?
Yes. M3 documents subcontract orders tied to a manufacturing order, where the operation runs on a work center of resource type 2 and a planned purchase order appears in PPS170, and subcontract orders without a manufacturing order for companies that send material to processors. How CloudSuite Fashion configures multi-step garment chains should be demonstrated with a real order.
How does Infor M3 handle landed cost on imported fabric?
M3 costs purchases with a costing model made of costing elements. Charges such as freight can be added to a purchase order, including third-party charges, and matched against invoices in APS360. Confirm with your partner how those charges reach each fabric item's stock value in your setup.
Does Infor M3 support AQL inspection for garments?
M3's Quality Management System creates quality inspection requests per item and lot, with tests and specifications, for receipts, manufacturing and returns. We did not find ISO 2859-1 sampling tables in its documentation, so AQL sample sizes and acceptance numbers at the buyer's level need an extension or a separate quality system.
How do you integrate with Infor CloudSuite Fashion through the ION API Gateway?
Register the application in the ION API Gateway, which issues OAuth 2.0 credentials in an .ionapi file, and call M3 API programs such as PPS200MI through the gateway with a bearer token. For a backend integration, Infor's documentation points to the resource owner grant with a service account. Store M3's own keys, never editable text.
Is Infor CloudSuite Fashion single-tenant or multi-tenant?
Infor's pages describe both. The fashion industry page says the suite is available in a multi-tenant cloud, and the CloudSuite Fashion documentation overview describes single-tenant delivery on AWS under a subscription. Confirm which your contract gives you, because it affects extensions and upgrades.
Is Infor CloudSuite Fashion good for a clothing brand that outsources production?
Yes for the commercial side of a large brand: purchase orders to factories, charges on imports, wholesale orders by matrix, Fashion PLM and the Infor Nexus network. It is weaker at following development, samples, T&A and inspections across many outside factories, which a brand usually runs in PLM or an operations layer. Skip the manufacturing modules.
Can Infor CloudSuite Fashion handle a buying agent's commission?
A buying agent needs a commission invoice to the buyer and no stock, goods payables or goods receivables; we did not verify a dedicated commission feature in Infor's documentation, so check it in your version. For a buying house with no stock, the full suite is heavy, and a lighter ERP plus an operations layer usually fits better.
Is Infor CloudSuite Fashion right for a small garment factory?
Usually not, in our judgement. The suite is aimed at large and upper mid-market companies and involves a partner-led, multi-module project. A single-site CMT or small full-package factory usually gets further with a smaller ERP for the books and an operations layer for style, orders, the floor and quality.
Infor CloudSuite Fashion vs SAP S/4HANA for fashion: which should a manufacturer choose?
Both have a native fashion model: Infor uses styles with SKUs on X, Y and Z feature groups and style-level structures, and SAP uses generic articles with variants and segmentation. Choose on the partner, the existing landscape and the modules needed. Neither covers sampling rounds, T&A, line-level floor capture or ISO 2859-1 AQL as standard.
·Glossary of apparel and Infor terms
Short definitions of the terms used in this chapter. The full list is on the guide glossary.
- AQL
- Acceptance quality limit: an inspection method that checks a random sample from a lot and accepts or rejects the lot on the defects found, using ISO 2859-1 tables.
- Balance ID
- In M3, an identity for stock at a location, which can carry its own attributes within a lot.
- CMT
- Cut, make and trim: a factory model where the buyer supplies fabric and the factory charges for making.
- Costing element
- In M3, one component of cost, such as freight or a discount, combined into a costing model.
- Dye lot
- A batch of fabric dyed together; lots can differ in shade and must not be mixed in one garment.
- Feature group
- In M3, one axis (X, Y or Z) of the fashion matrix, such as colour, size or fit.
- FOB
- Free on board: the price of goods loaded at the port of shipment, the usual garment quote.
- GSM
- Grams per square metre: the weight of fabric.
- Infor Nexus
- Infor's supply chain network for trading partners, listed as part of CloudSuite Fashion.
- ION API Gateway
- Infor's gateway that authenticates API callers with OAuth 2.0 and forwards requests to Infor applications.
- .ionapi file
- The credentials file Infor issues when an application is registered in the ION API Gateway.
- Landed cost
- Every cost of bringing goods in beyond the supplier's price: freight, insurance, duty, clearing, bank charges.
- MI program
- An M3 API program, such as PPS200MI for purchase order information.
- PP sample
- Pre-production sample in bulk fabric and trims that the buyer approves as the reference for production.
- QI request
- Quality inspection request: M3's record of the tests on an item and lot.
- SKU
- In M3, the item connected to a style for one combination of options, such as navy, size L.
- Style
- In M3, a comprehensive term for a number of similar items, the parent of its SKUs.
- Style/colour/size matrix
- A grid of colours by sizes used to enter or show quantities for each combination.
- T&A calendar
- Time and action calendar: an order's milestones with planned dates worked back from ex-factory, actual dates and owners.
·Checklists: an Infor apparel implementation on one page
Discovery
- Business type settled per buyer: CMT, full package, brand, agent or own label.
- One owner per decision; one workshop per department on a real order.
- All 52 fit-gap lines answered with evidence, decision and owner.
- Suite modules, tenancy and ION API access confirmed.
Design
- Feature groups X, Y, Z per product family; SKU numbering agreed.
- Lot attributes (shade, GSM, width) mandatory at receipt.
- Fabric unit design; SKU-level fabric exceptions generated from CAD.
- Costing elements for import charges; subcontract operations per processor.
- Where sampling, T&A, floor capture and AQL live.
Build, data, testing and go-live
- Configuration in dependency order; extensions listed with owners.
- Integrations link on M3 keys, one writer per field.
- Migration loaded in order with signed totals.
- All 13 scenarios passed by key users; cut-over rehearsed.
- Go-live between seasons; hypercare to the first month-end close.
·Sources
Infor pages were checked on 26 September 2026. M3 program codes are taken from Infor's M3 documentation (docs.infor.com); confirm them on your tenant's version.
- Infor, Fashion industry page (suite components, target segments, multi-tenant cloud) · infor.com
- Infor CloudSuite Fashion documentation, overview (single-tenant, AWS, subscription) · docs.infor.com
- Infor CloudSuite Fashion, M3 Product Data Management (style-level structures, lot attributes incl. shade) · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3 Fashion, Industry Process Catalog (cut and sew manufacturers) · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Settings for Style and Stock Keeping Unit (CRS582, PDS055, PDS050, PDS056, CRS040, MMS024, CRS759, CRS760, CRS912) · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Fashion Matrix plug-ins for customer order · docs.infor.com · for distribution order · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Define Alternate Unit of Measure (MMS015) · docs.infor.com · Catch weight settings · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Attribute control and attributes (ATS010) · docs.infor.com · View inventory by attribute · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Subcontract order and subcontract operation (resource type 2, PPS170) · docs.infor.com · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3 Planning Workbench for fashion · docs.infor.com · Planning and Scheduling Workbench for Fashion · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Costing purchased items and the costing model (costing elements, charges, APS360) · docs.infor.com · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Quality Management System (QI requests, QMS200) · docs.infor.com · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Purchase order settings (PPS096) and PPS200MI · docs.infor.com · docs.infor.com
- Infor M3, Create packing instruction and make available for supplier · docs.infor.com
- Infor OS 2024.x, ION API Gateway: choosing a grant type · docs.infor.com
- Infor Developer Portal, API interface for M3 · developer.infor.com · ION API SDK · github.com
- Community material on the m3api-rest path (not Infor documentation) · m3ideas.org
- ISO 2859-1, sampling procedures for inspection by attributes · iso.org · AQL tables · qima.com
- UCP 600, documentary credits · tradefinanceglobal.com
Corrections. Infor updates its cloud suite several times a year, and program names, suite composition and deployment options can change. If a statement here contradicts your tenant, report a correction with the version and the page you checked; we correct the chapter and note the change and its date here. We re-check the Infor facts in this chapter at least once a year.
Infor, Infor CloudSuite, Infor M3, Infor ION, Infor Nexus and Infor Ming.le are trademarks of Infor, used here only to name the products. This guide is not endorsed by Infor. SAP and S/4HANA are trademarks of SAP SE. Garment.io is named because MerchandiserOS integrates with it; this guide is not endorsed by Garment.io.